Text dating dot com
Ps 37), and it is also possible that Jeremiah borrowed from Job to express his themes of suffering and, “the fact that Uz is mentioned in Jeremiah is hardly of pivotal significance unless it can be proved by other evidence that the name had not arisen until the age of Jeremiah or else was unknown to the Hebrews before his time” 1) The book is understood to be legend and a depiction of the imprisonment and eventual release of king Jehoiachin But Jehoiachin was not a righteous men and was not ever restored to his kingdom prior to his death 2) Although the problems of suffering was severe for the nation at the time of the exile, the exile was not the only time the nation suffered, and again the suffering in the book is personal rather than national 3) The identification of the tempter as “Satan” was Persian, but it was also an identification under David (1 Chron 21:1; Ps 109:6) 4) The Aramaisms in the book suggest a late date, but Aramaic was used for hundreds of years before the Exile 5) Although several passages seems to refer to a national tragedy (; 12:6, 13-25; ) they are not clear enough, nor particular enough to demand an exilic interpretation 6. Similarity in language with Job and the writings of Jeremiah are cited as the basis for this time of composition (cf. But the comparisons and language are not determinative since they can be found in other writings (cf.
Traditionally, the period between the end of Roman Britain (conventionally dated 410) and the end of Anglo-Saxon England (at the Battle of Hastings in 1066) has been known as the Dark Ages, but, in these politically correct times, this has been deemed to be pejorative, and there is a tendency to use the phrase Early Medieval (or even Late Antiquity) instead.There are even hints that these rulers might in some way have been trying to revive the late Roman military command of the , because only forts of that command were apparently re-used.A survey of 5th-6th century archaeological data from all 4th century Roman forts in North and West Britain, showed that out of at most 16 sites with later 5th-6th century evidence no fewer than 14 had probably been under the command of the at the end of the 4th century.5th and 6th century written sources and inscriptions hint at the survival of Roman-style bureaucratic administration, Roman law, Roman weights and measures, and schooling on the Roman model to train future administrators and judges...Although independent British kings ruled these kingdoms, there is no reason to suppose they were less Romanised than most of the elite of the 4th century.